Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Engaging the Culture: J. R. R. Tolkien's The Hobbit


Today we begin discussing J. R. R. Tolkien’s The Hobbit.  Be forewarned that this post may contain spoilers!

Although J. R. R. Tolkien’s devotion to the Catholic faith is no secret, little about The Hobbit seems to suggest that Tolkien meant to convey anything about his personal beliefs through his writings.  The book presents itself as a delightful children’s story that takes on the traditional questing theme, but in a lighthearted manner; Bilbo Baggins, after all, is not exactly standard hero material.  No one ever discusses morality, no one ever mentions God.  However, as G. K. Chesterton writes in The Everlasting Man, “It is impossible, I hope, for any Catholic to write any book on any subject…without showing that he is a Catholic.”  Tolkien’s philosophy and values form the basis for the entire book, guiding his choice of hero, his depiction of character development, and his final decision to turn his children’s story into a surprisingly sophisticated commentary on personal morality and the nature of war.  His world and the rules that guide it are ultimately Catholic, even if the characters are not.

Tolkien’s Middle-earth is meant to be our world, though in a time long ago before Christianity.  The characters do not know or worship Christ, but they are theoretically still bound by the moral law written on our hearts.  That is, they have the ability to recognize evil and a responsibility to choose good.  Though no character refers to a deity (Gandalf comes close by suggesting that something more than luck preserves Bilbo throughout his adventures), they all instinctively recognize the value of qualities such as honesty, loyalty, and hospitality while instinctively hating the senseless violence of the orcs.  Nearly all the characters at some point will face temptation to do wrong, and their response to that temptation will rule their fate.

Tolkien, however, never resorts to allegory to depict man’s struggle with temptation.  Instead, he depicts it naturally through the choices faced by his characters.  Their story resonates because these choices have real consequences—evil is repaid with evil and good repaid with good.  Although it sometimes seems that in this life the wicked flourish while the good suffer, a Catholic worldview holds that in the end all will receive their just reward.  The consequences experienced by the characters of The Hobbit reflect this belief and thus seem fitting.

So it is that Smaug, overcome with pride, reveals to Bilbo his one weakness—and seals his own fate.  The dwarfs, overcome with dragon lust, determine to sit on their pile of gold until they starve—and suffer for it.  Bilbo alone resists greed for wealth and he alone is able to return to his home whole and happy.  The key to the entire text lies in Thorin’s final words to the Hobbit: “If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.”  This is no ordinary quest story.  Bilbo does not leave his comfortable Hobbit hole to gain something as vulgar as gold.  Rather, he leaves his Hobbit hole because doing so enables him to grow as a person, to recognize the value of what he already has, and to serve as an example for others.

Such a message contradicts many of those seen today in books and film.  How often are we emotionally manipulated by storytellers to cheer for an adulterous relationship?  How often do we find ourselves secretly approving of characters who take revenge on those who have wronged them, rather than extending forgiveness?  We may find ourselves able to relate to such characters, but we cannot admire them--not as we can admire Bilbo and his surprising strength and courage.  Bilbo is fairly unique among modern heroes.  He is an Everyman, but one who demonstrates the possibility of personal moral growth.  He gives hope to us all.

So will Peter Jackson's version of The Hobbit keep the underlying Christian themes?  I cannot say with certainty as I have yet to view the film.  However, unless Jackson makes major changes to the story (such as he did with Aragorn, Faramir, and Treebeard in The Lord of the Rings), the overall message of evil leading to evil and good leading to good should remain.  If not, at least viewers may find themselves inspired to read Tolkien's original work.  

3 comments:

  1. Good analysis! I didn't actually know that Tolkien meant Middle Earth to be our world a long time ago. Where did you read this?

    I got to see the midnight release of The Hobbit. Personally, I loved it, but I don't tend to be a purist when it comes to movie adaptions of books, so I didn't mind the changes to Aragorn, Faramir, or Treebeard (I also thought Faramir's character arc in the movies made a lot more sense in the extended versions). There were definitely some significant changes in The Hobbit, but most of them were just additions of some elements from Tolkien's notes, the appendices of LOTR, or the Silmarillion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Humphrey Carpenter edited some of Tolkien's letters. The book is called The Letters of J. R. R. Tolkien (no surprise there!) if you're interested. He mentions basing Middle-Earth as being our world a couple times. For instance:

      "'Middle-earth', by the way, is not a name of a never-never land without relation to the world we live in (like the Mercury of Eddison). It is just a use of Middle English middel-erde (or erthe), altered from Old English Middangeard: the name for the inhabited lands of Men 'between the seas'. And though I have not attempted to relate the shape of the mountains and land -masses to what geologists says or surmise about the nearer past, imaginatively this 'history' is supposed to take place in a period of the actual Old World of this planet" (22). Letter to the Houghton Mifflin Co .

      He also mentions basing the Shire particularly on England and that his intent with Middle-earth was to create a body of legend for his country, since England didn't have anything like the great Norse myths, for example.

      Midnight release?! You are so lucky! I know Jackson claims he pulled a lot of the material from the appendices and such, but I'm still worried about major character changes and stuff like the inclusion of females who weren't in the book. I love what he did with the LotR movies and yet I can't help but think that he missed the entire philosophy underlying the works.

      I have dreams of doing a series of posts on some of the changes made to Jackson's LotR trilogy and what they mean in light of Tolkien's themes, but that would require me to read the book again, so I don't know when or if that will ever happen! I'd love to open up a discussion though because I have talked to people who like some of the changes Jackson made. For example, one friend argues that making Aragorn reluctant to fulfill his destiny makes him more relatable. But... is Aragorn supposed to be relatable? That is the question! And one I'd love to explore with other people.

      Anyway, I'm definitely looking forward to seeing The Hobbit regardless. It's good to know that you enjoyed it--it definitely makes me feel better knowing that fans of Tolkien appreciate what Jackson has done with this film.

      Delete
  2. I'm a bit worried about the inclusion of females too, but that won't come till the second movie. So we'll have to wait and see. Galadriel was in this one, but not in a very big role.

    And thanks for the "Letters of J. R. R. Tolkien" reference. Hopefully I'll get around to reading it someday.

    ReplyDelete