Series: The Lord of the Rings #1
Published: 1954
Source: Purchased
Summary: A young Hobbit discovers that he has come to possess the One Ring, forged by an evil
lord to find the other Rings of power in order to corrupt them and their works
and bring the world into his control. He
sets off on a quest, aided by eight companions, to destroy the Ring in the only
way possible. He must walk across Middle-Earth and into the country of the enemy and then cast the Ring into the
volcanic fires in which it was made. The
fate of the world is hanging around his neck.
Review: It is always difficult to review a work that
one loves, and it is even more difficult to review that work in pieces. Though The
Fellowship of the Ring is often cast as the first book in a series, it of
course is really the first volume in what was written as a single book, a
single story. Publishers and a paper
shortage were the causes of the resulting “trilogy.” So though what is in Fellowship is good, it is not complete, and readers are left on a
lakeshore wondering not just if Frodo will succeed in his quest, but also whether
he is even close to his goal at all.
For although The Lord
of the Rings is about Frodo’s journey to Mount Doom, and the journeys of
others who are trying to pave his way, The
Fellowship of the Ring is not.
Readers unfamiliar with the story (Are there many left after the release
of Jackson’s movies?) will not even know that Frodo intends to go into Mordor
at all. Here his goal is first to get to
Rivendell. To get to Rivendell and hand
this burden to someone else. Someone, we
must assume, bigger and stronger and better equipped to deal with the serious
matters of the world. When Frodo says,
“I will take the Ring, though I do not know the way,” it is a surprise, and one
that sets the tone of the entire story.
Here we see a small Hobbit become large and know that there is something
surprising in each of us, as well.
And this amazing story is told in absolutely beautiful
language. Tolkien was a philologist and
deeply interested in words, so the ones he used in his books were chosen with
care. In The Lord of the Rings he uses language that evokes the spirit of the Middle Ages (which we most
often associate with knights and deeds of honor), though of course he is not
writing in Middle English at all, or even drawing upon the standards like “hark”
and “prithee” and “thou” that make so
much fantasy sound ridiculously clunky.
Many readers think Tolkien’s writing sounds “old,” but with care they
might find it is his sentence structure and not his vocabulary at all. In fact, hints of his modern Englishness
often slip into the text, if less often than in The Hobbit.
Poems scattered throughout the work give a sense that there
is a deeper history propping the world of this book up. Readers learn about the cultures and their
values through their poetry and the subjects they preserve in it. Elvish poems tell tales from Tolkien’s Silmarillion and hint at all the people
and deeds of Middle-Earth that had passed before this Second Age even
began. Hobbit poems speak of food and
comfort or silly tales of trolls. Poetry
is not often Tolkien’s strongest suit, and some readers like to skip it, but in
truth much is missed when they do, including simply some really good stories.
In terms of themes, we have not yet come completely to the
big ones: the struggle between good and evil, Sauron’s attempt to steal God’s
role and create, the price of studying too closely the arts of the enemy. Here, we have friendship. Though of course this strengthens in later
volumes, we begin to see here the three Hobbits who insist on accompanying
their friend Frodo on a dangerous journey simply because they do not want him
to go alone. At first, they invite
themselves to Bree and then to Rivendell.
Then they invite themselves farther, intending to go with him as far as
Mordor. They plead for the opportunity
to do so, for Elrond in all his wisdom would have sent them home.
The rest of the Fellowship (but Boromir?) is loyal, and we
see bonds begin to grow there as well, including between Legolas and Gimli who
will finally overcome all the prejudices of their people. Yet the best friendship we see is among the Hobbits, the everyday little people who are more like us than are the great
heroes like Aragorn. C. S. Lewis says in
The Four Loves that “Friendship is
unnecessary, like philosophy, like art…It has no survival value; rather it is
one of those things which give value to survival,” but here he appears to be
wrong. Without Sam and Merry and Pippin’s
friendship, Frodo would not have survived, perhaps even failing far from Mount
Doom, right at the beginning when he was still near the Shire. The friendship between Frodo and Sam is
perhaps one of the most beautiful ever written.
The Lord of the Rings
is undoubtedly an exciting tale, one that finds fans because it offers heroes
and swordfights and a frighteningly power evil.
Yet its greatest strength and the secret to its survival as a classic lie
in its portrayals of truth and human nature, even if it is sometimes embodied
in Elves or hobbits or dwarves. Because The Fellowship of the Ring starts this
epic adventure, it has a little more time to offer pictures of the home that
make fighting evil, of any kind, worth it.
It is the most directly happy and hopeful of the volumes and a beautiful
beginning.
0 comments:
Post a Comment